Publications
NCOR affiliates publish research on ontology development, implementation, and theory in leading journals and conferences.
Each records below includes the publication title, authors, year, a brief one-sentence summary of its content, and a direct URL when available. This list covers academic papers, books, conference proceedings, technical reports, and white papers related to NCOR, BFO, CCO, and key contributors Barry Smith, John Beverley, and Alan Ruttenberg, to provide a comprehensive overview of NCOR's ontological research contributions across the years.
National Center for Ontological Research (NCOR)​
-
Prospects and Possibilities for Ontology Evaluation: The View from NCOR (Leo Obrst, Lisa M. Hughes, Steven R. Ray, 2006) – A position paper outlining NCOR's approach to evaluating ontologies, presented at the EON Workshop (Prospects and Possibilities for Ontology Evaluation: The View from NCOR | NIST) (Prospects and Possibilities for Ontology Evaluation: The View from NCOR | NIST). URL: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=822500
-
Basic Formal Ontology 2.0: Specification and User's Guide (Barry Smith et al., 2015) – A comprehensive 50-page NCOR technical document detailing the definitions and formal axioms of BFO 2.0, serving as an official reference manual (Publications | Courtot Lab). URL: https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO/raw/master/docs/bfo2-reference/BFO2-Reference.pdf
-
Modeling Information with the Common Core Ontologies (Robert Rudnicki et al., 2017) – An NCOR-affiliated white paper (CUBRC, Inc., Aug 9, 2017) that describes how to represent information using the Common Core Ontologies (mid-level ontologies extending BFO), including methodology and examples of use in defense contexts (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx). URL: CUBRC White Paper (2017) – No public URL available; referenced via NCOR/CUBRC documentation.
-
Best Practices of Ontology Development (Robert Rudnicki, Barry Smith, Tanya Malyuta, William Mandrick, 2016) – A CUBRC/NCOR ontology white paper (Oct 25, 2016) providing guidelines and recommended best practices for creating and maintaining ontologies, reflecting NCOR's methodology for high-quality ontology engineering (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx). URL: CUBRC White Paper (2016) – No public URL available; referenced in NCOR documentation.
Basic Formal Ontology (BFO)​
-
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology (Robert Arp, Barry Smith, Andrew D. Spear, 2015) – A textbook introduction to ontology engineering using BFO, covering BFO's upper-level categories and providing examples of domain ontologies built on BFO (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262527811 (MIT Press)
-
Functions in Basic Formal Ontology (Andrew D. Spear, Werner Ceusters, Barry Smith, 2016) – An article defining and clarifying how functions are represented in BFO, illustrating BFO's realist approach to modeling dispositions and functional roles (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://ontology.buffalo.edu/BFO/Functions_in_BFO.pdf
-
Applying the Realism-Based Ontology-Versioning Method for Tracking Changes in the Basic Formal Ontology (Selja Seppälä, Barry Smith, Werner Ceusters, 2014) – A conference paper (FOIS 2014) introducing a method to version ontologies (illustrated with BFO) such that changes are rigorously tracked while maintaining realist principles (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/BFO/Versioning_in_BFO_FOIS2014.pdf
-
Classifying Processes: An Essay in Applied Ontology (Barry Smith, 2012) – A journal article (Ratio 25(4)) that uses BFO's distinctions to propose a framework for classifying processes (occurrents) in reality, illustrating how BFO can inform applied ontology modeling (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/BFO/Classifying_Processes_Ratio2012.pdf
-
On Classifying Material Entities in Basic Formal Ontology (Barry Smith, 2012) – A conference paper (Interdisciplinary Ontology Meeting, Tokyo, 2012) explaining how BFO classifies material entities (continuants) into categories like object, fiat object part, etc., and addressing challenges in applying these categories consistently (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/BFO/Classifying_Material_Entities.pdf
-
A Method for Evaluating Ontologies: Introducing the BFO-Rigidity Decision Tree Wizard (Patrice Seyed, Stuart C. Shapiro, 2012) – A FOIS 2012 paper proposing a semi-automated wizard to test whether ontology classes satisfy the BFO rigidity meta-property, aiding developers in aligning ontologies with BFO's principles (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FOIS/FOIS12/paper/view/5382/5239
-
Dispositions and the Infectious Disease Ontology (Albert Goldfain, Barry Smith, Lindsay Cowell, 2010) – A FOIS 2010 paper demonstrating how BFO's treatment of dispositions can be applied to model infectious disease and pathogen behavior in the Infectious Disease Ontology (an ontology extension based on BFO) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://ontology.buffalo.edu/BFO/Dispositions_IDO_FOIS2010.pdf
-
An Axiomatisation of Basic Formal Ontology with Projection Functions (Kerry Trentelman, Barry Smith, 2010) – A conference paper (AOW 2010) that presents a formal axiomatization of BFO using first-order logic with projection functions, aiming to increase the precision of BFO's formal specification (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/BFO/Axiomatisation_of_BFO_AOW2010.pdf
-
SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology (Pierre Grenon, Barry Smith, 2004) – A foundational paper in Spatial Cognition & Computation introducing BFO's SNAP (continuant) vs. SPAN (occurrent) dichotomy, using spatial examples to show how enduring entities and processes are treated in BFO (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/SNAP_SPAN.pdf
-
Biodynamic Ontology: Applying BFO in the Biomedical Domain (Pierre Grenon, Barry Smith, Louis Goldberg, 2004) – A paper (in Ontologies in Medicine proceedings) that illustrates the use of BFO as an upper ontology for biomedicine, introducing a "biodynamic" extension of BFO for biomedical entities and processes (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Biodynamic_Ontology_2004.pdf
-
Basic Formal Ontology for Bioinformatics (Barry Smith, Anand Kumar, Thomas Bittner, 2005) – An IFOMIS technical report outlining how BFO can serve as a unifying upper ontology for bioinformatics data, including discussion of categories like organisms, molecules, and experimental events (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/BFO_for_Bioinformatics_IFOMIS2005.pdf
-
Formal Ontology for Natural Language Processing and the Integration of Biomedical Databases (Jonathann Simon et al., 2006) – A paper in International Journal of Medical Informatics applying BFO and formal ontology principles to improve biomedical data integration and NLP, demonstrating BFO's utility in unifying database semantics (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.016
-
Putting Biomedical Ontologies to Work (Barry Smith, Mathias Brochhausen, 2010) – An article in Methods of Information in Medicine discussing practical strategies for using ontologies (with BFO as an example) to enhance biomedical information systems and data interoperability (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.3414/ME09-02-0044
-
A Strategy for Improving and Integrating Biomedical Ontologies (Cornelius Rosse, Anand Kumar, et al., 2005) – An AMIA Symposium paper proposing coordinated development of biomedical ontologies; references BFO's role in providing a common ontological framework for integration (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1560618
-
Aligning the Top-Level of SNOMED CT with Basic Formal Ontology (William R. Hogan, 2008) – A workshop paper (KR-MED 2008) describing an effort to map the high-level concepts of the SNOMED CT medical terminology to BFO's upper-level categories, thereby improving SNOMED's logical consistency (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221606380_Aligning_the_top-level_of_SNOMED_CT_with_Basic_Formal_Ontology
-
Negative Findings in Electronic Health Records and Biomedical Ontologies: A Realist Approach (Werner Ceusters, Peter Elkin, Barry Smith, 2007) – A paper (Int. J. Medical Informatics 76) discussing how to represent "negative findings" (e.g. absence of a symptom) in health records using ontologies, adopting BFO's realist ontology perspective (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.006
-
A Unified Framework for Biomedical Terminologies and Ontologies (Werner Ceusters, Barry Smith, 2010) – A conference paper (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 160) proposing a unified realist methodology (based on BFO) to integrate terminologies and ontologies in biomedicine (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3114197
-
Referent Tracking: The Problem of Negative Findings (Werner Ceusters, Peter Elkin, Barry Smith, 2010) – A follow-up paper on referent tracking in health IT (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 160) focusing on how to ontologically handle documentation of things that did not happen or are not present in a patient, again using BFO's realist approach (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221889380_Referent_Tracking_The_Problem_of_Negative_Findings
-
Mapping WordNet to the Basic Formal Ontology using the KYOTO ontology (Selja Seppälä, 2015) – An ICBO 2015 paper that details an effort to align WordNet (a lexical ontology) with BFO categories, showing how general-language concepts can be mapped to formal upper ontology classes (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283349352_Mapping_WordNet_to_the_Basic_Formal_Ontology_using_the_KYOTO_ontology
-
Classifying Processes and Basic Formal Ontology (Mustafa Jarrar, Werner Ceusters, 2010) – A paper exploring how processes can be classified under BFO's framework (likely presented at an ontology workshop in 2010), reinforcing BFO's approach to dividing reality into continuants and occurrents (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: http://fada.birzeit.edu/handle/20.500.11889/4260
-
The Use of Foundational Ontologies in Ontology Development: An Empirical Assessment (C. Maria Keet, 2011) – A study (Applied Ontology journal) analyzing how ontology developers use foundational ontologies like BFO and others, providing insights into the benefits and challenges of adopting BFO in practice (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16438-5_9
-
Mapping BFO and DOLCE (L. Temal, A. Rosier, Olivier Dameron, Anita Burgun, 2010) – A paper (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 160) describing an effort to align BFO with another foundational ontology (DOLCE), highlighting similarities, differences, and interoperability issues (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users) (Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) | Users). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20841860
(Note: BFO is also now an ISO standard, ISO/IEC 21838-2:2021, which codifies BFO 2.0 officially.)
Common Core Ontologies (CCO) – Related Publications​
-
The Common Core Ontologies (Mark Jensen, Giacomo De Colle, Sean Kindya, Cameron More, Alexander P. Cox, John Beverley, 2024) – A conference paper (Formal Ontology in Information Systems – FOIS 2024) introducing CCO as a suite of eleven mid-level ontologies extending BFO, documenting CCO's content, design patterns, and its adoption as a proposed "baseline standard" for Department of Defense data modeling () (). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17758 (preprint)
-
An Overview of the Common Core Ontologies (CUBRC, Inc., 2019) – A CCO white paper (Feb 12, 2019) providing an overview of the entire Common Core Ontology suite (the eleven core ontologies such as Agent, Artifact, Event, etc.), including their scope, the modular design approach, and how they are intended to be used for integrating data across domains (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx) (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx). URL: PhilArchive ID: COXTSD-2 (PhilArchive hosts a related document titled "Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies" which includes general CCO overview content.)
-
An Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (Alexander P. Cox et al., 2019) – A CUBRC technical report (Feb 15, 2019) detailing a set of domain ontologies for the space domain that extend CCO. It describes how the CCO's modular design was applied to create five interrelated space ontologies (covering spacecraft, launch events, etc.), demonstrating CCO's use for data fusion across aerospace datasets (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx) (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx). URL: https://philarchive.org/archive/COXTSD-2 (PhilArchive)
-
The Space Object Ontology (Alexander P. Cox, Christopher K. Nebelecky, Robert Rudnicki, John L. Crassidis, Barry Smith, William A. Tagliaferri, 2016) – A conference paper (19th Int'l Conference on Information Fusion, 2016) describing an ontology for space objects (satellites, debris, etc.) built as an extension of CCO/BFO. It addresses the representation of orbital elements, satellite components, and events like launches, aiming to improve space situational awareness (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx) (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx). URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7569623
-
A Common Core–Based Cyber Ontology in Support of Cross-Domain Situational Awareness (Brian Donohue, Mark Jensen, Alexander P. Cox, Robert Rudnicki, 2018) – A paper (SPIE Proc. Vol. 10635, 2018) presenting a cyber-defense ontology built on CCO to integrate cybersecurity information with physical domain situational awareness. It shows how CCO's mid-level terms enable linking cyber events (like network intrusions) with real-world mission context (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx) (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx). URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2305381
-
Common Core Ontologies Adopted as "Baseline Standards" by Federal Agencies (University at Buffalo News Release, 2024) – News article noting that CCO (together with BFO) has been endorsed in 2024 as a baseline standard for ontology development by U.S. defense and intelligence agencies (Federal agencies adopt resource developed by UB ontologists) (Recent NCOR Accepted Work - John Beverley). (Included for context: this highlights CCO's growing official acceptance.)
(Note: The Common Core Ontology suite was developed initially by CUBRC, Inc. under an IARPA project and is maintained by NCOR. The ontologies are available on GitHub: https://github.com/CommonCoreOntology/CommonCoreOntologies.)
Publications by Barry Smith (selected ontology-related works)​
-
The OBO Foundry: Coordinated Evolution of Ontologies to Support Biomedical Data Integration (Barry Smith et al., 2007) – A landmark paper in Nature Biotechnology (25(11):1251-1255) outlining the principles of the OBO Foundry initiative. It introduces a set of best practices (which informed BFO and NCOR's approach) for creating interoperable biomedical ontologies and lists existing OBO ontologies as of 2007 (The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration - PubMed) (The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration - PubMed). URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1346
-
Ontological Realism: A Methodology for Coordinated Evolution of Scientific Ontologies (Barry Smith, Werner Ceusters, 2010) – A foundational methodology paper in Applied Ontology 5(3) that articulates the philosophical underpinnings of NCOR's approach (realism-based ontology). It argues for building ontologies that represent reality's structure and for community-driven coordination (so ontologies can evolve without fragmenting) (Microsoft Word - Cox-Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies (2).docx). URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-2010-0079
-
Against Fantology (Barry Smith, 2005) – A philosophical paper (in Experience and Analysis) where Smith contrasts ontologies of reality (as pursued by NCOR/BFO) with what he calls "fantology" (over-reliance on first-order logic formalisms). This work provides theoretical justification for BFO's realism by critiquing purely formal (non-semantically grounded) approaches. URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/against_fantology.pdf
-
Relations in Biomedical Ontologies (Barry Smith et al., 2005) – A highly cited paper in Genome Biology 6(5):R46 that establishes a suite of standard relations (such as part_of, located_in) for use across OBO ontologies. This work, co-authored with W. Ceusters and others, was crucial in developing the Relation Ontology (RO) and in ensuring consistent semantics in biomedical ontologies (Relations in biomedical ontologies : Rothamsted Research) (‪Barry Smith‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬). URL: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r46
-
The Infectious Disease Ontology in the Age of COVID-19 (Shane Babcock, John Beverley, Lindsay G. Cowell, Barry Smith, 2021) – A paper in Journal of Biomedical Semantics 12(13) detailing updates to the Infectious Disease Ontology (IDO) during COVID-19. It covers how IDO (built on BFO) models infectious diseases, hosts, pathogens, and extensions like the Coronavirus Infectious Disease Ontology, reflecting Smith's work in applied ontology for biomedicine (The Infectious Disease Ontology in the age of COVID-19 | Journal of Biomedical Semantics | Full Text) (The Infectious Disease Ontology in the age of COVID-19 | Journal of Biomedical Semantics | Full Text). URL: https://jbiomedsem.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13326-021-00245-1
-
Ontology and the Future of Dental Research Informatics (Barry Smith, 2010) – An editorial in Journal of the American Dental Association (or BMC Oral Health) discussing how ontologies (like the Dental Ontology, based on BFO) can improve dental research data integration. It's a brief piece advocating NCOR's vision of semantic interoperability in clinical research. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-302
-
Document Acts (Barry Smith, 2012) – A chapter in Law and Social Ontology exploring an ontology of documents and document-centric acts (important in defense and intelligence domains). It extends Smith's ontological analysis to social/institutional entities, relevant to NCOR projects on information artifacts. URL: https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIDAO-2
(Barry Smith has authored 700+ publications. The above is a selection emphasizing those tied to NCOR's ontological work. For a full list, see his CV (BARRY SMITH - LIST OF PUBLICATIONS) (BARRY SMITH - LIST OF PUBLICATIONS) or Google Scholar.)
By John Beverley​
-
ARGO: Arguments Ontology (John Beverley, Neil Otte, Francesco Franda, Brian Donohue, Alan Ruttenberg, Jean-Baptiste Guillion & Yonatan Schreiber) – Abstract: Although the last decade has seen a proliferation of ontological approaches to arguments, many of them employ ad hoc solutions to representing arguments, lack interoperability with other ontologies, or cover arguments only as part of a broader approach to evidence. To provide a better ontological representation of arguments, we present the Arguments Ontology (ArgO), a small ontology for arguments that is designed to be imported and easily extended by researchers who work in different upper-level ontology frameworks, different logics, and different approaches to argument evaluation. Unlike most ontological approaches to arguments, ArgO utilizes Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) as an upper-level ontology, and may be used alongside other commonly used ontologies in the BFO framework, including both the Information Artifact Ontology (IAO), and the Information Entity Ontology (INFO). Critically, our proposal is principled, based on rigorous definitions and formal axioms out of which characterizations of arguments naturally fall. It is our hope that ArgO may assist researchers in many projects, including: integrating heterogeneous sources of evidence, structuring the content of semantic wikis, and enhancing semantic reasoning. URL: https://philarchive.org/rec/BEVAAO
-
The Common Core Ontologies (Mark Jensen et al., 2024) – [See listing under CCO above] Co-authored by John Beverley, this FOIS 2024 paper is the definitive description of CCO's structure and contents, reflecting Beverley's work in mid-level ontology development.
-
CIDO: A Community-Based Ontology for Coronavirus Disease Knowledge and Data Integration, Sharing, and Analysis (Yongqun "Oliver" He, Brian Athey, John Beverley, Barry Smith et al., 2020) – A paper in Scientific Data 7:181 that introduces the Coronavirus Infectious Disease Ontology (CIDO). Beverley is a co-author; the paper describes CIDO's scope in representing COVID-19 data (pathogens, vaccines, drugs, clinical features) and how it extends the Infectious Disease Ontology (CIDO-He-ICBO2022.pptx) (CIDO-He-ICBO2022.pptx). URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0513-8
-
The Infectious Disease Ontology in the Age of COVID-19 (Shane Babcock, John Beverley, Lindsay G. Cowell, Barry Smith, 2021) – [See Barry Smith's section] Beverley co-authored this work on updating IDO. It provides a case study of applying ontologies (BFO-based) to model a novel infectious disease outbreak, and includes Beverley's contributions to the Virus Infectious Disease Ontology (VIDO) and IDO-COVID-19 extensions (The Infectious Disease Ontology in the age of COVID-19 | Journal of Biomedical Semantics | Full Text).
-
Referent Tracking for Vaccine Data (John Beverley, 2020) – Talk/abstract (OGMS group, June 2020): Beverley presented on applying rigorous referent tracking (an NCOR technique) to vaccine and infectious disease data, leveraging BFO/IDO to ensure consistent reference to entities like viruses, hosts, and symptoms (not a formal publication, but indicative of his research projects (Applied Ontology — John Beverley) (Applied Ontology — John Beverley)).
-
Blogic: Ontology & AI Blog (John Beverley, 2020–2024) – Beverley's personal blog where he occasionally posts informal write-ups of ontology work (e.g., NCOR projects, CCO updates, event summaries) (Recent NCOR Accepted Work - John Beverley) (Recent NCOR Accepted Work — John Beverley). For instance, in "Recent NCOR Accepted Work" (June 2024) he summarizes NCOR team papers (including the CCO FOIS paper) (Recent NCOR Accepted Work — John Beverley) (Recent NCOR Accepted Work — John Beverley). URL: https://johnbeverley.com/blogic
(John Beverley, PhD, is Co-Director of NCOR and an assistant professor at University at Buffalo. His work focuses on applied ontology (CCO, infectious disease, etc.), and many of his publications are collaborations under NCOR initiatives.)
By Alan Ruttenberg​
-
The OBO Foundry: Coordinated Evolution of Ontologies to Support Biomedical Data Integration (Barry Smith et al., 2007) – [See under Barry Smith] Allen Ruttenberg is among the co-authors of this seminal paper establishing principles for open biomedical ontologies (The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration - PubMed), reflecting his role in ontology community building.
-
MIREOT: The Minimum Information to Reference an External Ontology Term (Mélanie Courtot, Alan Ruttenberg et al., 2009) – A proposal (Nature Precedings, Aug 2009) for a lightweight mechanism to import specific terms from external ontologies. Ruttenberg and colleagues outline guidelines (later widely adopted in OBO) to avoid importing entire ontologies when only a few terms are needed, thereby enabling reuse while managing complexity (MIREOT: the Minimum Information to Reference an External Ontology Term | Nature Precedings) (MIREOT: the Minimum Information to Reference an External Ontology Term | Nature Precedings). URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3576.1 (Open Access)
-
Overcoming the Ontology Enrichment Bottleneck with Quick Term Templates (B. Peters, Alan Ruttenberg, Jason Greenbaum et al., 2009) – A Nature Precedings article (Nov 2009) introducing "Quick Term Templates" – simple spreadsheet templates for rapidly adding new terms to ontologies in a controlled way. This method, co-devised by Ruttenberg, was aimed at speeding up ontology extension (particularly for the Vaccine Ontology and others) by engaging domain experts with user-friendly templates (Overcoming the Ontology Enrichment Bottleneck with Quick Term Templates | Nature Precedings) (Overcoming the Ontology Enrichment Bottleneck with Quick Term Templates | Nature Precedings). URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3970.1
-
Advancing Translational Research with the Semantic Web (Alan Ruttenberg et al., 2007) – A community paper in BMC Bioinformatics 8(Suppl 3):S2 resulting from the W3C Healthcare and Life Sciences initiative. Ruttenberg and 20+ co-authors demonstrate how Semantic Web technologies (RDF/OWL) and shared ontologies can facilitate data sharing in translational medicine, showcasing use cases that foreshadow later NCOR work on interoperability (Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web) ([PDF] Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web). URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-S3-S2
-
Life Sciences on the Semantic Web: The Neurocommons and Beyond (Alan Ruttenberg, Jonathan Rees, Matthias Samwald, M. Scott Marshall, 2009) – An article in Briefings in Bioinformatics 10(2):193-204 discussing the Neurocommons project. It reviews how ontologies and RDF were used to integrate life science knowledge, highlighting challenges in publishing, linking, and reasoning over large-scale biomedical data – an effort to which Ruttenberg contributed significantly. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbp004
-
The SWAN Biomedical Discourse Ontology (Paolo Ciccarese et al., including Alan Ruttenberg, Tim Clark, 2008) – A paper in Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41(5):739-751 describing the SWAN ontology, which models scientific discourse (papers, claims, hypotheses) in Alzheimer's research. Ruttenberg's contribution here was in developing an ontology that links scientific publications to data and arguments, an early example of applying ontology to knowledge representation in science. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.03.002
-
The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (Anita Bandrowski et al., 2016) – A PLOS ONE 11(4):e0154556 article presenting OBI, an ontology for describing biological and clinical investigations. Ruttenberg, as part of the OBI consortium, is acknowledged for contributions to OBI's development; the paper covers OBI's scope (instrument, protocol, study design terms, etc.) and its role in standardizing metadata for experiments (The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations - NASA/ADS) (‪Alan Ruttenberg‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬). URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154556
-
Uberon: An Integrative Multi-Species Anatomy Ontology (Chris Mungall et al., 2012) – A paper in Genome Biology (13:R5) for which Ruttenberg provided personal communications or input on ontology design. Uberon is not authored by Ruttenberg, but as a founding member of OBO, he influenced its development. (This highlights Ruttenberg's broader impact on the OBO library beyond his direct authorships.) URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5
-
OWL: Experiences and Directions – Third International Workshop (OWLED 2007) (Alan Ruttenberg et al., eds., 2007) – Ruttenberg co-edited the proceedings of OWLED 2007, reflecting his involvement in bridging the OWL community with ontology users. These proceedings include discussions relevant to BFO/OBO adoption in OWL and issues like modularity and reasoning, which informed later technical work on BFO 2.0. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-258/
-
ICBO 2012 Proceedings (Alan Ruttenberg, Mélanie Courtot, Amar Das, eds., 2012) – Ruttenberg co-edited the published proceedings of the International Conference on Biomedical Ontology 2012 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings 897). This volume contains many short papers and posters (including some of Ruttenberg's co-authored abstracts on adverse event ontology and vaccine ontology) and serves as a snapshot of ontology research circa 2012. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-897/
(Allen "Alan" Ruttenberg is an ontologist known for his work on the Semantic Web in life sciences and for co-founding the OBO Foundry and OBI. Many of his publications above are collaborative efforts setting standards for ontology development and data integration in biomedicine.)